For instance, many of you, if feel, sure have seen the following:
|
Not new and it would astonish me if most of you have not seen this or some version of this.
Most parents know that a child's behavior should carry some consequences, should it not? Our Congress, then, which we openly criticize and praise, could be said to be acting like a spoiled child, could it not? I know I have ranted right here about their behavior.
Term limits: let us look at the positive value of term limits. But first I want to introduce you to a reference book.
Congressional Deskbook: The Practical and Comprehensive Guide to Congress, Fifth Edition (Legislative Series) [Paperback]
If a book such as this is needed for a person to be able to do their job, you have to ask yourself why?
Here it becomes difficult for me to reduce my thoughts to cogent sentences and paragraphs.
Congress, the club, makes its own rules. We here them referred to all the time in the news.But few of us have any idea what the rules are. So we write our congressman or senator and ask them to do this or that or the other. But the "Rules" are strict and they can't just jump up and do something. Most things must go to a committee. And in order for it to get to the committee "Rules" must be followed. Protocol must be observed. The bill must be considered by some group, then placed on some other groups agenda for further consideration and recommendation to be forwarded to the appropriate committee for study and review, etc., etc. I believe I'm correct, in general, on the above.
In order to get any action on the proposal, what do you suppose must happen? Well, the key players, or gatekeepers, at any stage must be persuaded of the merit of the proposal or at least convinced to pass it along. And here is where deals are made
Tenure, yes, tenure. This thought train is about tenure. So the merit of tenure is that a congressman has the time to read the book, and learn the ropes and then be able to actually introduce something of their own.
But why is all of this necessary? Rules; which powerful interests have devised for the purpose of ? Control!
For a couple of centuries now, the cry of the public has been, "throw the bums out" and get a new bunch of ?...... Bums? And that is essentially what we do. Replace republican bums for democratic bums, but regardless of the "sex" they're all from the same litter.
If that is a positive result of tenure, what is an example of a negative? Since rules proved order and control does it not make sense that the person(s) who know them the best and are most adept at their use will have more control over the process than others? Sure it does and you can follow your own train of thought from there about the possible results, good or bad.
In conclusion it seems to me that there are enough examples of special interests, pork and favoritism for us to see that without consequences the behavior is not likely to change. I do not believe that you or I would "...cut off our own nose to spite our face". So the real answer is for us to run for political office or to get appointed to an office. How? well a start is to become politically active. Accept appointment to a committee or group in your city or county government, by actually going to the mayor or whomever and asking to be on the committee, whether it's animal control (dog catcher) or housing and zoning, etc.
If we are not leading we are following or standing still. (<--- Sorry, overly simplistic).